PEMUDA UMNO is known for their radicalism and extremist defense of Ketuanan Melayu one opposition journalist has contended that all UMNO Youth leaders were “perceived as pro-Malay, anti-Chinese in their days” Shortly before Ops Lalang in 1987, where then UMNO Youth Chief Nasib Rosak stated to “bathe a keris with Chinese blood” ( Nasib Rosak is the product of Dato’ Harun Idris – the architect of May 13 Massacre)
At the same rally, banners were hoisted carrying phrases such as “revoke the citizenship of those who opposed the Malay rulers”, “May 13 has begun” ( May 13 racial and massacre riots in 1969), and “soak the keris with Chinese blood”
Some of the Malay NGOs sponsored UMNO still calling the Chinese and Indian – ‘ PENDATANG ‘
Original settlers are the Orang asli ( Orang Asal)…The Malay were themselves MIGRANTS Due to their
skill in farming and a little in trading..the Malays (of different tribes) raped the Land from the Orang asli
The Mat Salleh raped New England (USA) from the American Native…Mat Salleh molested the Maoris and
took away their land and rights!
In 2005, Hishammuddin Hussein brandished the keris at the UMNO (AGM) while decrying critics of Article 153 of the Constitution of Malaysia and the social contract Both Article 153 and the social contract preserve special privileges for the Malays.
2004 AGM, party Deputy Permanent Chairman Badruddin Amiruldin waved a book on the May 13 riots while warning non-Malays not to stir a ” hornets’ nest ” and cautioning, “Let no one from the other races ever question the rights of Malays on this land.”
The 2006 UMNO AGM was noted for controversial statements by such as Hashim Suboh, who asked Hishammuddin when he would “use” the keris; Hishammuddin had again brandished the keris at the assembly that year. Millions saw that haughtiness act live on TV
Several delegates raised the issue of the Malay Agenda, and called for greater enforcement of the NEP. In response to concerns over the racial rhetoric, Muhyiddin Yassin said that “Although some sides were a bit extreme , it is quite normal to voice feelings during the assembly.” Khairy Jamaluddin, insisted that “while there is nothing extraordinary about this year’s congress and that similar sentiments have been raised in the past, these feelings have never compromised the ultimate manifestation of governance in this country through BN’s power sharing formula.” Hishammuddin also defended the delegates’ actions, saying that events earlier in the year related to the status of Islam in Malaysia and the NEP had “played on the Malay psyche. If they had not been allowed to release their feelings in a controlled channel, it could have been even worse.” He defended his usage of the keris, saying it was meant “to motivate the Malays” and that it “is here to stay”, denying that it was a symbol of Malay supremacy
Is ’1 MALAYSIA’ brandname genuine?
