Anwar can be “guilty” in the eyes of men if is alleged to have abused his good office as DPM under mahathir and made millions of illgotten monies for himself. But no. Here we have Anwar accused of sodomy. And the complainant himself said in court that he had been sodomised many times and for a long period of time. This “long period of time” must mean since he started working as an aid to Anwar. This evidence in itself is an admission of consent in the act alleged.And irrespective that the offence of Sodomy is in the Penal Code, the act between consenting adults should only be sin against God. Indeed such act cannot cause any loss to the country unlike corruptions and abuse of power that certainly do.
Now that RPK has also joined UMNO’s bandwagon of “building the public’s perception” against Anwar, and has sadly started singing the very UMNO’s tune, he is adding nothing new to what malaysians have already been used to be fed with by the government controlled media. RPK would be better welcomed if he out in excile in UK came out with something entirely new that he had picked up in a foreign land where most malaysian do not even dream of visiting, let alone making it a second home. When he came out with a stale news RPK is not only abusing the laws of this country by fleeing away from possible imprisonment here in Malaysia, he has abused the goodwill of a friendly country, UK, and for far too long. He makes himself “above the law”, and that is an abuse of the rule of law. Therefore what right has he to condemn Anwar? Anwar first underwent the Sodomy I, stayed in prison, been arrested, and put under ISA and presently is fighting the charge of Sodomy II. Certainly RPK, even in carrying the name “Raja”, is not fit to criticise Anwar. He can forget it – RPK is not even “fit to untie the shoelace of Anwar’s shoes”.