According to Masing, money politics is bad. But sometime it’s OK good. It depends lah help me help you lah!
____________________
PRS files election petition over Pelagus seat
The party had “very good reason to believe that money politics was involved there in the state election”.
Borneo Post, Friday May 20, 2011
SIBU: Parti Rakyat Sarawak (PRS) has filed an election petition to nulify the result of the contest for the Pelagus seat in the April 16 state election.PRS Pelagus division chief Philimon Nuing accompanied by party Information chief Wilson Nyabong and lawyer Sim Hoi Chuan filed the petition at the Sibu High Court today.
According to Nyabong, who is the Pelagus seat director of operations, the party had “very good reason to believe that money politics was involved there in the state election”.
The petition was filed before senior assistant registrar Suhailla Selag.
In the election, PRS/BN candidate Stanley Nyitar @ Unja ak Malang was involved in a three-cornered fight with Edward Sumbang of Parti Keadilan Rakyat and George Lagong who stood as an independent.
George won the election with a 2,837-vote majority.
He garnered 5,740 votes against 2,903 obtained by Stanley and the 1,171 obtained by Edward.
The voter turnout was 9,986. This is the first petition filed after the election. – Bernama
_____________________
BN-PRS rep: We don’t pay, they won’t vote
Malaysia Kini, Saturday, 28 May 2011
Payments to voters cannot be considered vote-buying because it was for their transportation, says a BN MP in Sarawak.
Tamin BN assemblyperson Joseph Mauh Ikeh has vehemently shot down any allegation of vote-buying during the Sarawak state polls.
He clarified that the payments to voters was ‘transport allowance’ otherwise they would not come out to vote.
Besides the transport allowance, some of the voters were paid for campaign work like putting up posters, according to the Parti Rakyat Sarawak vice-president.
“This is normal. It is not vote-buying. We paid the voters for them to buy petrol because they came to vote at their own expense, or else they would not have come out to vote,” he told Malaysiakini when contacted today.
“If no money was paid, nobody would come to vote, then who is going to be elected as YB (assemblyperson)?” he asked.
His statement was in response to the polls watchdog Malaysian Election Observation Network’s (MEO-Net) allegation yesterday that some Tamin voters were paid RM50 on April 14, two days before the polling day.
‘Everybody is doing it’ argument
MEO-Net had released a short video recording showing stacks of cash purportedly being distributed to voters at the Rumah Unban Anak Endu longhouse located at Tenting Terentang in Nanga Selangau.
The three-term MP and two-term state assemblyperson claimed that the opposition was doing the same to get the electorate to vote.
“Eveybody did that, the opposition also did that. We also have proof of the other side (opposition). They gave RM10, RM20 and even RM100 to the voters.
“Both opposition and BN paid the voters throughout Sarawak in all 71 constituencies, he added.
Joseph Mauh also stressed that the law allows each candidate to spend up to RM100,000 in an election.
“We paid them but they still had the freedom to vote. That’s why over 3,000 had voted for the opposition.
“This is not vote-buying, please, this is just something like saguhati (consolation),” he said.
Joseph Mauh retained the Iban-majority seat with 4,998 votes, a 1,292-majority over PKR’s Mengga Mikui who bagged 3,706 votes.
MEO-Net has been furnishing evidence of alleged vote-buying, intimidation and abuses of government resources during the 10-day Sarawak election campaign period.
The watchdog claimed money politics was so rampant that were all allegations investigated extensively, they are likely to nullify the state election results.
According to MEO-Net, giving money to voters is an offence under section 10(a) of the Election Offences Act 1954.